Current:Home > StocksWhat is the U.K. plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda? -FundGuru
What is the U.K. plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda?
View
Date:2025-04-15 03:04:57
London — The British parliament passed a law late Monday that will mean asylum seekers arriving on British shores without prior permission can be sent to Rwanda and forbidden from ever returning to the U.K. The British government says the law will act as deterrent to anyone trying to enter the U.K. "illegally."
The contentious program was voted through after the U.K.'s Supreme Court ruled it to be unlawful, and it has been condemned by human rights groups and the United Nations refugee agency.
King Charles III, who now must give the Rwanda bill his royal ascent to make it an official law, reportedly criticized the plan as "appalling" almost two years ago as it took shape.
Hours after the law was passed, French officials said at least five people drowned, including a child, in the English Channel during an attempt to make it to the U.K. on an overcrowded small boat. Officials later clarified that the five fatalities were caused by a crush among the more than 110 people who had crowded onto the boat. CBS News' partner network BBC News reported Wednesday that British law enforcement had arrested three men in the U.K. in connection with the incident.
Why would the U.K. send asylum seekers to Rwanda?
The Rwanda plan was put together by Britain's Conservative government in response to a number of migrant and asylum seeker arrivals on British shores in small boats from France.
With local asylum programs underfunded and overwhelmed, the government has been housing asylum seekers in hotels, where they are effectively trapped and unable to work until their claims are processed, which can take years. These hotels cost the government around 8 million pounds — almost $10 million in taxpayer money — every day to rent, according to CBS News partner BBC News.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's government says the Rwanda policy will act as a deterrent to prevent migrants and asylum seekers from trying to reach the U.K. in the first place.
What is the U.K.'s Rwanda law?
The new policy will give Britain's immigration authorities power to send any asylum seeker entering the U.K. "illegally" after January 2022 to Rwanda. Those individuals can also be forbidden from ever applying for asylum in the U.K.
It will apply to anyone who arrives in the U.K. without prior permission — anyone who travels on a small boat or truck — even if their aim is to claim asylum and they have legitimate grounds to do so.
These people can, under the new law, be immediately sent to Rwanda, 4,000 miles away in East Africa, to have their asylum claim processed there. Under the law they could be granted refugee status in Rwanda and allowed to stay.
What are the issues with the Rwanda law?
The law has been the subject of intense controversy and political wrangling.
In November 2023, the U.K. Supreme Court ruled the program was unlawful and violated the European Convention on Human Rights, because it said genuine refugees would be at risk of being deported back to their home countries, where they could face harm. The judgment also cited concerns with Rwanda's human rights record.
The final legislation passed late Monday orders the court to ignore parts of the Human Rights Act and other U.K. and international rules, such as the Refugee Convention, that would also block the deportations to Rwanda, the BBC reported.
Rights groups have said they will launch legal challenges against deporting people to Rwanda as quickly as possible. This could delay any removal flights.
- In:
- Immigration
- Rishi Sunak
- Rwanda
- Britain
- Refugee
- Asylum Seekers
- Migrants
- United Kingdom
Haley Ott is the CBS News Digital international reporter, based in the CBS News London bureau.
Twitter InstagramveryGood! (39)
Related
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Ocean cleanup group deploys barges to capture plastic in rivers
- Sri Lanka’s president will appoint a committee to probe allegations of complicity in 2019 bombings
- Jessa Duggar is pregnant with her fifth child: ‘Our rainbow baby is on the way’
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Tennis star Rosemary Casals, who fought for equal pay for women, reflects on progress made
- Foreign student arrested in Norway on suspicion of espionage including electronic eavesdropping
- Kylie Jenner and Jordyn Woods Film Their First Video Together in 4 Years Following Reunion
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- U.K. terror suspect Daniel Khalife still on the run as police narrow search
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- NASCAR Kansas playoff race 2023: Start time, TV, streaming, lineup for Hollywood Casino 400
- Appeals court reduces restrictions on Biden administration contact with social media platforms
- Mossad chief accuses Iran of plotting deadly attacks, vows to hit perpetrators ‘in heart’ of Tehran
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Ukraine: Americans back most U.S. steps for Ukraine as Republicans grow more split, CBS News poll finds
- 1 year after Queen Elizabeth's death and King Charles' ascension, how has Britain's monarchy fared?
- College football Week 2 winners, losers: Texas may really be back, Alabama seems in trouble
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Art Briles was at Oklahoma game against SMU. Brent Venables says it is 'being dealt with'
Islamist factions in a troubled Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon say they will honor a cease-fire
Ravens' J.K. Dobbins updates: RB confirmed to have Achilles injury
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Florida football coach suspends himself after video shows him verbally attacking player
Virginia governor pardons man whose arrest at a school board meeting galvanized conservatives
Judge denies Mark Meadows' request to move Georgia election case to federal court