Current:Home > ScamsFTC sends over $2.5 million to 51,000 Credit Karma customers after settlement -FundGuru
FTC sends over $2.5 million to 51,000 Credit Karma customers after settlement
Fastexy Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 17:34:31
More than 50,000 Credit Karma customers will soon receive checks or PayPal payments as part of a $2.5 million Federal Trade Commission payout.
The FTC first took action in 2020 against Credit Karma, the credit-monitoring and finance app acquired in 2020 by financial software giant Intuit. The FTC accused the service of misleading consumers with promises of credit card pre-approvals.
According to the FTC, Credit Karma misled consumers by falsely claiming they were "pre-approved" for certain credit card offers that they did not actually qualify for.
Credit Karma ultimately agreed to stop making those claims and to pay $3 million to compensate customers who the FTC said were deceived into wasting time and potentially harming their credit scores. On Thursday, the FTC announced that more than $2.5 million would be distributed among 50,994 customers.
FTC and Credit Karma settlement
Between February 2018 to April 2021, roughly one-third of consumers who applied for "pre-approved" offers were ultimately denied, according to the FTC action announced in September 2022. The complaint alleged that because of Credit Karma's misleading claims, customers wasted time applying for offers and incurred negative dings to their credit scores due to unnecessary checks and hard inquiries.
Find the loan that's right for you: Best personal loans
The FTC alleged that Credit Karma buried disclaimers in fine print or falsely claimed consumers had “90% odds” of approval. It also said that the company was aware of the deception, citing training materials that allegedly told new employees how to deal with the common customer complaint of being denied for a "pre-approved" offer.
“Credit Karma’s false claims of ‘pre-approval’ cost consumers time and subjected them to unnecessary credit checks,” said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a 2022 statement. “The FTC will continue its crackdown on digital dark patterns that harm consumers and pollute online commerce.”
As part of the agreement between the company and FTC, Credit Karma not only had to pay $3 million but was also prohibited from duping customers about pre-approval or approval odds moving forward. The company was also required to preserve relevant records to "help prevent further use of deceptive dark patterns."
Credit Karma did not immediately respond to request for comment.
The company previously told CBS MoneyWatch in a statement that they "fundamentally disagree with allegations the FTC makes in their complaint, which relate solely to statements we ceased making years ago."
"Any implication that Credit Karma rejected consumers applying for credit cards is simply incorrect, as Credit Karma is not a lender and does not make lending decisions," the company said.
The company told CBS it had reached an agreement with FTC to "put the matter behind" Credit Karma so that it can "maintain our focus on helping our members find the financial products that are right for them."
Who is getting payouts from the FTC?
On Thursday, the FTC announced that $2.5 million will be distributed to 50,994 Credit Karma customers who filed a valid claim for reimbursement before the March 4, 2024 deadline.
Depending on what impacted customers chose at the time of filing, they will receive payments in the mail or digitally via their PayPal accounts. Checks must be cashed within 90 days and PayPal payments must be accepted within 30 days.
Consumers who have questions about their payment should contact the administrator, JND Legal Administration, at 866-848-0871, or visit the FTC’s website to view frequently asked questions about the refund process.
The FTC noted that it never requires payment or sensitive information, like bank account or Social Security numbers, to distribute payments. If someone claiming to be from the FTC asks for such things, it is a scam, warns the agency.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Nicole Kidman Announces Death of Her Mom Janelle After Leaving Venice Film Festival
- Slain Dallas police officer remembered as ‘hero’ during funeral service
- Ilona Maher posed in a bikini for Sports Illustrated. It matters more than you think.
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Kendrick Lamar will headline 2025 Super Bowl halftime show in New Orleans
- A rural Georgia town in mourning has little sympathy for dad charged in school shooting
- Iowa judge rules against Libertarian candidates, keeping their names off the ballot for Congress
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Deion Sanders after Nebraska loss: 'No idea' why Colorado had such a hard time
Ranking
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Parrots and turtles often outlive their owners. Then what happens?
- Wisconsin health officials recall eggs after a multistate salmonella outbreak
- A mural honoring scientists hung in Pfizer’s NYC lobby for 60 years. Now it’s up for grabs
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- ‘The Room Next Door’ wins top prize at Venice Film Festival
- Rap megastar Kendrick Lamar will headline the 2025 Super Bowl halftime show
- Hope for North America’s Most Endangered Bird
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Mother of Georgia shooting suspect said she called school before attack, report says
Hope for North America’s Most Endangered Bird
Wynn Resorts paying $130M for letting illegal money reach gamblers at its Las Vegas Strip casino
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Maui’s toxic debris could fill 5 football fields 5 stories deep. Where will it end up?
How many teams make the NFL playoffs? Postseason format for 2024 season
Sharp divisions persist over Walz’s response to the riots that followed the murder of George Floyd